Notifications
No Notifications

Welcome to the Neuroarts Resource Center!

June 2026 Update: Messaging is now live! Please try out this new feature and let us know what you think.

Our team will periodically post updates in this space to keep you informed on how the platform is evolving. Thank you for being part of the neuroarts community.

Neural representations of beat and rhythm in motor and association regions

October 10th, 2024
Ontario, Canada
Joshua D Hoddinott, Jessica A Grahn
This research article employs more sensitive multivariate pattern analyses (MVPAs) to test whether SMA and basal ganglia activity represent only beat strength or if these regions are also sensitive to other individual rhythmic features. They, then, used these analyses to examine whether other regions showed evidence of representing the beat.
Cerebral Cortex
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhae406
Posted byRiley Fitzpatrick

Abstract/Description

Humans perceive a pulse, or beat, underlying musical rhythm. Beat strength correlates with activity in the basal ganglia and supplementary motor area, suggesting these regions support beat perception. However, the basal ganglia and supplementary motor area are part of a general rhythm and timing network (regardless of the beat) and may also represent basic rhythmic features (e.g. tempo, number of onsets). To characterize the encoding of beat-related and other basic rhythmic features, we used representational similarity analysis. During functional magnetic resonance imaging, participants heard 12 rhythms-4 strong-beat, 4 weak-beat, and 4 nonbeat. Multi-voxel activity patterns for each rhythm were tested to determine which brain areas were beat-sensitive: those in which activity patterns showed greater dissimilarities between rhythms of different beat strength than between rhythms of similar beat strength. Indeed, putamen and supplementary motor area activity patterns were significantly dissimilar for strong-beat and nonbeat conditions. Next, we tested whether basic rhythmic features or models of beat strength (counterevidence scores) predicted activity patterns. We found again that activity pattern dissimilarity in supplementary motor area and putamen correlated with beat strength models, not basic features. Beat strength models also correlated with activity pattern dissimilarities in the inferior frontal gyrus and inferior parietal lobe, though these regions encoded beat and rhythm simultaneously and were not driven by beat alone.

Associated Authors

Associated Organizations

Associated Journals/Periodicals