Notifications
No Notifications

Welcome to the Neuroarts Resource Center!

June 2026 Update: Messaging is now live! Please try out this new feature and let us know what you think.

Our team will periodically post updates in this space to keep you informed on how the platform is evolving. Thank you for being part of the neuroarts community.

Sound relief: Restorative Music as a strategy to improve clinician wellbeing

September 19th, 2026
N. Salehi, C. Takarabe, M. Walesa, L. Pause, G. Agarwal, B. Bonakdarpour
This preliminary study found that a 20-minute Restorative Music intervention was associated with improved emotional wellbeing and a significant increase in self-reported energy among healthcare professionals, from 56% to 83%. While the findings suggest music may offer an accessible way to reduce workplace stress, controlled studies are needed to establish its effectiveness.
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1864986
Posted byclaudia kania

Abstract/Description

Over 50% of healthcare providers experience physician burnout, characterized by emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and an increased risk of medical malpractice. Although burnout is well-documented, fewer studies have examined accessible interventions that may support healthcare professionals during the workday. Studies have associated music-based interventions with reduced stress and increased relaxation. This preliminary study examined whether a brief Restorative Music intervention was associated with short-term changes in emotional state and perceived energy among healthcare professionals. The Restorative Music intervention consisted of 20-min sessions incorporating Clinically Designed Improvisatory Music (CDIM) and Slow Irish Airs selected for calming musical qualities such as slow tempo and simple rhythmic structure. A total of 724 healthcare workers, including physicians, neurology staff, and social workers, accessed the intervention, and 51 participants completed voluntary surveys assessing emotional state, tension, pleasure, likelihood to recommend, and subjective energy. We analyzed pre- and post-intervention energy ratings using a non-parametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Participants reported favorable ratings for emotional state and likelihood to recommend. Subjective energy increased from an average of 56% before the intervention to 83% after the intervention; the Wilcoxon signed-rank test confirmed significantly higher post-intervention ratings (W = 13.5, p

Associated Authors

Associated Organizations