Using electronic health records to evaluate a children and young people’s social prescribing service: challenges and implications for research and practice
April 24th, 2026
London, United Kingdom
Jessica K Bone, Feifei Bu, Daisy Fancourt, Daniel Hayes
This study used administrative records from one CYP SP service in England to (1) understand the quality of data captured in SP administrative records, (2) explore which CYP are currently receiving SP and what SP entails in practice and (3) assess the impact of SP on well-being.
BMJ Mental Health
DOI: 10.1136/bmjment-2025-302442
Posted byRiley Fitzpatrick
Pending staff verification
Notify
Abstract/Description
Background: Preliminary evidence indicates that social prescribing (SP) can improve children and young people’s (CYP) well-being but is limited by small non-representative samples and often relies on descriptive statistics. Given the wide implementation of SP in the UK, administrative records provide a unique opportunity to understand current practice and assess impacts on well-being.
Objectives: (1) To understand the quality of data captured in SP administrative records. (2) To explore which CYP are currently receiving SP and what SP entails in practice. (3) To assess the impact of SP on well-being.
Methods: We used administrative records from one CYP SP service in England. Records were extracted from Joy, an online platform for managing SP. Over 18 months, 770 age-eligible CYP were referred to SP, 203 of whom were successfully discharged and completed two pre-post measures of well-being (the short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale; SWEMWBS) at least 7 days apart. We used descriptive statistics, a paired t-test to assess changes in well-being and linear regressions with interactions to test effect modification.
Findings: Missing data was the largest issue, with ethnicity missing for 94% of CYP. A lack of detail and inconsistent recording for both individual characteristics and SP practices also presented challenges. Despite this, we identified that most CYP were referred by their GP, followed by their school, with 97% referred because of their mental health. The most common pathway was to receive SP for around 90 days, with 10–15 link worker contacts and 6 contact hours. Following SP, SWEMWBS scores improved by 3.72 points (t(202)=17.50, 95% CI 3.30 to 4.14, p
Objectives: (1) To understand the quality of data captured in SP administrative records. (2) To explore which CYP are currently receiving SP and what SP entails in practice. (3) To assess the impact of SP on well-being.
Methods: We used administrative records from one CYP SP service in England. Records were extracted from Joy, an online platform for managing SP. Over 18 months, 770 age-eligible CYP were referred to SP, 203 of whom were successfully discharged and completed two pre-post measures of well-being (the short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale; SWEMWBS) at least 7 days apart. We used descriptive statistics, a paired t-test to assess changes in well-being and linear regressions with interactions to test effect modification.
Findings: Missing data was the largest issue, with ethnicity missing for 94% of CYP. A lack of detail and inconsistent recording for both individual characteristics and SP practices also presented challenges. Despite this, we identified that most CYP were referred by their GP, followed by their school, with 97% referred because of their mental health. The most common pathway was to receive SP for around 90 days, with 10–15 link worker contacts and 6 contact hours. Following SP, SWEMWBS scores improved by 3.72 points (t(202)=17.50, 95% CI 3.30 to 4.14, p
